One Identity to Rule Them All

Privacy and ethical concerns around biometric technology have more than doubled in a single year, rising from 31% to 67% among end users: the sharpest year-on-year shift recorded in HID's 2026 State of Security and Identity Report, published this week. The finding sits at the centre of a wider picture in which organisations are accelerating the unification of physical and digital identity systems, only to find that the speed of convergence is intensifying pressure on individual rights.

The report draws on responses from more than 1,500 security and IT professionals, end users and industry partners across regional and global markets. Identity management ranks as the top strategic priority, cited by 73% of respondents, the highest figure across every category surveyed, with 60% planning spending increases. Ramesh Songukrishnasamy, Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at HID, said: "Security leaders are clearly under pressure to modernise access and identity infrastructure, but our research shows they're equally focused on the governance, protection and transparency that build lasting trust. The organisations succeeding in 2026 are those giving stakeholders meaningful solution choice while maintaining robust security."

Convergence Accelerates

Seventy-five per cent of organisations have either deployed converged identity solutions (29%) or are actively evaluating them (46%), a unified approach that allows a single credential to span building access, network login and cloud applications simultaneously. The business case is clear: unified platforms reduce administrative overhead, improve user experience and close the gap between physical and digital domains that attackers have learned to exploit, now increasingly armed with AI-powered tools capable of generating deepfakes, synthesising biometric spoofs and automating credential-stuffing at scale.

Barriers to convergence remain significant. Budget constraints top the list at 51%, followed by implementation complexity (37%) and a shortage of internal expertise (34%). Thirty per cent expressed concern that a compromised converged platform could grant unauthorised access to both facilities and sensitive data simultaneously. Fifteen per cent reported being unaware of available solutions, pointing to an education gap that the report says vendors and integrators need to address.

Integration complexity is the universal friction point across every technology the report covers: 52% of organisations cite it as the primary challenge for identity management systems, 37% for physical-digital convergence, and 33% for RFID. Platform consolidation does deliver measurable returns, with organisations reporting improved efficiency (44%), simplified management (30%) and enhanced visibility (16%), but the report notes that few offerings in the market can yet truly support full unification.

Mobile Matures; Biometrics Draw Scrutiny

Mobile credentials have crossed from emerging technology to infrastructure baseline, with 74% of organisations having deployed (36%) or planning deployment (38%). Security improvements now lead adoption at 50%, surpassing user convenience at 34%, a reversal from prior years that reflects organisations recognising the security advantages of biometric authentication and encrypted communication over physical cards. Eighty-four per cent still operate hybrid environments combining mobile and physical credentials, and looking five years ahead, 80% predict mostly mobile or balanced deployments, though only 8% expect fully mobile environments. Cost sensitivity has risen sharply: 44% now cite implementation costs as their primary barrier, up from 24% in 2025.

Biometric adoption continues to grow, with 46% of security professionals viewing it as a strategic priority, 34% having already deployed it and a further 23% planning to do so. Fingerprint recognition leads at 71%, followed by facial recognition at 50%, and accuracy and reliability remain the dominant implementation priorities, cited by 70% of end users and 85% of industry partners. Yet the ethical dimension is increasingly difficult to set aside. Nearly 30% of respondents said privacy concerns influenced a decision not to deploy biometrics in 2025, and 31% described themselves as very concerned and actively implementing safeguards, including encryption at rest and in transit and compliance with sector-specific regulations such as HIPAA.

Location Tracking and the Limits of Familiarity

Real-time location solutions are among the report's more distinctive findings: 42% of end users identify them as a strategic priority, and 40% have already deployed the technology, which uses RFID and Bluetooth Low Energy to track people and assets across facilities. Worker safety and compliance is the primary adoption driver at 69%, with use cases spanning hospitals tracking shared medical equipment, manufacturers monitoring personnel in hazardous zones and logistics operations optimising warehouse flows. Asset management follows as a secondary driver at 59%. Despite this momentum, 47% of organisations have not deployed the technology, and 38% of industry partners report that their customers remain simply unfamiliar with what it can do.

RFID more broadly has reached near-mainstream status, with 54% of organisations reporting current usage, primarily for asset tracking and inventory management. Sixty-two per cent cite faster inventory tracking as their top benefit, followed by improved visibility (41%) and loss prevention (37%). The report also highlights a growing specialised application in medical device management, where RFID supports unique device identification requirements and lifecycle compliance. For the 46% yet to adopt, perceived tag and reader costs (35%) and integration complexity (33%) remain the primary obstacles.

Privacy as Strategy

The ethical and privacy thread runs through every trend the report documents. Data privacy concerns are a barrier not only for biometrics (67% expressing concern) but for real-time location solutions (29%), mobile credentials (19%) and physical-digital integration (30%). Thirty-six per cent of organisations are actively developing policies around biometric use. The 12% who remain unconcerned are, by the report's assessment, potentially underestimating both regulatory exposure and reputational risk. The report's broader conclusion is that as identity platforms extend across physical and digital domains simultaneously, privacy governance is shifting from compliance obligation to competitive differentiator.

Previous
Previous

The AI Security Confidence Paradox: Why 87% of Organisations Think They Are Ready — and 46% Are Wrong

Next
Next

Enterprises Are Running AI at Scale. Their Governance Isn’t.